Amniocentesis Research - Pregnancy, Prenatal Screening, Diagnosis, Risks, Down syndrome

Amniocentesis Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Amniocentesis, including details on pregnancy, prenatal screening, diagnosis, risks, down syndrome.


Amniocentesis Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Amniocentesis

Books on Amniocentesis

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Comparison of lamellar body counts using light microscopy with standard coulter counter techniques to assess fetal lung maturity.

Hunter LA, McKenna DS, Baptista MA

OB/GYN Resident PGY3, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio, USA. doctorpud@hotmail.com

OBJECTIVE: To determine if lamellar body counts determined using light microscopy and a manual hemochromocytometer correlate with counts made on standard electronic cell counters. METHODS: Aliquots of amniotic fluid samples obtained by amniocentesis to assess fetal lung maturity were divided into two sterile tubes. One tube was sent immediately to be counted in a cell counter by standard technique and the other tube was stored at -70 degrees C until manual counting could be performed. Manual counts on the same samples were made on two different occasions. Intra-observer variability and correlation with the standard technique was determined. Pearson coefficient was calculated. RESULTS: There were 11 specimen pairs. The intra-observer correlation was significant: intraclass correlation coefficient 0.95 (CI 0.84-0.99). There was significant correlation between the Coulter counter lamellar body counts and manual counts: intraclass correlation coefficients 0.88 (CI 0.62-0.97) and 0.92 (CI 0.73-0.98), respectively. CONCLUSION: Lamellar body counts determined by light microscopy correlate well with results obtained for lamellar body counts using standard Coulter counter techniques. Results of this pilot study show that this experimental method of evaluating fetal lung maturity deserves further evaluation.

Published 10 January 2006 in Gynecol Obstet Invest, 61(1): 29-33.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2005-2008 Amniocentesis Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Amniocentesis Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 2 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)



Amniocentesis Books

Testing Women, Testing the Fetus : The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America (The Anthropology of Everyday Life) (The Anthropology of Everydaylife)

Testing Women, Testing the Fetus : The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America (The Anthropology of Everyday Life) (The Anthropology of Everydaylife)